Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru | National Assembly for Wales
Y Pwyllgor Newid Hinsawdd, Amgylchedd a Materion Gwledig | Climate Change, Environment and Rural Affairs Committee
Bil Anifeiliaid Gwyllt a Syrcasau (Cymru) | Wild Animals and Circuses (Wales) Bill
WA 25
Ymateb gan : Dr Corsini, Doctor Meddygaeth Filfeddygol a chynrychiolydd o Ente Nazionale Circhi
Evidence from : Dr Corsini, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine and representative of Ente Nazionale Circhi
As a vet with the passion of taking a sceptical approach to analysing animal arguments and ethics and providing a scientific basis for debunking them and passionate of animal ethics I whish for this attachment to serve as my written evidence as part of the proposed ban on the above activity in Wales on ethical grounds.
My work in this
field has been published numerous times in various Italian
newspapers and I contacted scientists who had previously published
their studies on circus animals to make them aware that their
work have been misinterpreted by Prof. Stephen Harris, whose
literature has been used to push for a ban on the use of circus
animals in Italy and other Countries or to propose an Euthanasia of
animals that cannot be relocated. A review article should
survey and summarizes previously published studies. To read a
review in a critical way, has to be read the studies quoted in it,
this is how I discovered that field studies have been
misinterpreted. This hasn’t been done by other organisations
such like Eurogroup4Animals, BVA, and Federation fo Veterinary
Europe, who used his work for policy making.
Stephen Harris has provided a lot of scientific reviews in support
of animal rights groups and funded by them tunes of hundreds of
thousands of pounds as shown by a freedom of information request to
the University of Bristol, where he has been working. In recent
years The Telegraph and other publications have reported on his
mistepresentation of existing scientific studies and his losing his
position as an expert witness in the prosecution of persons accused
of illegally hunting foxes with hounds.
Ethical arguments are complex issues that need to be studied, and on the animal topic there are philosophies that claim to value nature and/or living organisms over at least some economic considerations, and view the role of humanity as preserver and supporter, rather than mere exploiter. In spite of their seemingly similar goals, animal rights organisations, welfare organisation and biological conservationists (the main animal philosophies) have often found themselves on opposite sides of policy debates.
Animal rights supporters believe that it is morally wrong to use animals in any way and that human beings should not do so, Animal welfare supporters believe that human animal relationship can exist but humans has to guarantee their wellbeing, conservation biology is concerned with species, populations, ecosystems or even global phenomena.
Animal welfare science is the scientific study of the welfare of animals as pets, in zoos, laboratories, on farms and in the wild. Although animal welfare has been an ethical issue, the investigation system of animal welfare is done using rigorous scientific methods, it is a point of view that I, as a vet, consider crucial.
Someone
could assume that something is not natural therefore animal is
suffering,but reality is more complex. On the scientific paper
‘Naturalness and Animal Welfare’ (2018, published
on ‘Animals by Yates’) the Author points out
Naturalness it is a vague and ambiguous term, which needs
definition and assessments suitable for scientific and ethical
questions, furthermore there is a lack of an agreed definition or
operational approach to assess how natural an animal’s
behaviour ‘attempts to cope with its environment’, The
vague assumptions that naturalness is reliably associated with
better wellbeing are unfounded. Consequently, those concerned with
naturalness and those concerned with feelings may often find
themselves in disagreement. The problem related on circuses is that
studies on welfare on circuses are few, and the authors of this
field studies agree that it is not the circus itself that is
causing sufferance, but how is managed, and that there is a great
variability on management types. The exercise instead has been
recognised as environmental enrichment.
One of the last studies on circuses, Welfare of sea lions in
travelling circuses, published by the Wageningen Livestock Research
on 2014, the experts that scored the overall welfare state of sea
lions have strongly divergent opinions on the welfare state of sea
lions kept in travelling circuses, that was related by different
frame of reference and variability of situations.
If we are addressing our policy making on animal welfare we shoud definely set a standard evaluation system and a welfare scale, with a mark point, and ban the practices that do not reach this point. If we are addressing our policy making on animal rights side, we should ban zoos, pets, animal research, meat and animal derivatives consumption as well.